Kwadwo Dickson

Dr. Amoakohene summons contractors over poor work on Drobonso District Court project

The Ashanti Regional minister, Dr Frank Amoakohene, has reaffirmed the government’s
commitment to ensuring that all public projects meet the highest standards, as he
summones contractors responsible for the Drobonso District Court project over concerns
regarding the quality of work.
During an inspection of the project, Dr Amoakohene observed alarming structurel defects
including visible cracks in the building and deteriorating ceiling, raising serious safety
concerns.
I am extremely disappointed in the shoddy work done by the contractors,” Dr. Amoakohene
said. “The cracks and deteriorating ceiling are a clear indication of the poor quality of work,
and it’s unacceptable.”
The Minister emphasized that the government expects contractors to deliver high-quality
projects that meet the required standards.

Government committed to resolving power deficit amid WAPCo maintenance

The Minister of Energy and Green Transition, John A. Jinapor, has reiterated the
government’s commitment to swiftly addressing the power supply shortfall caused by
ongoing maintenance activities on the West African Gas Pipeline (WAGP).
Speaking to journalists in Tema after a tour of the West African Gas Pipeline Company
Limited (WAPCo) Tema Regulating and Metering Station at Bankuman on Friday,
February 21, 2025, Mr. Jinapor said that with the planned maintenance exercise, known
as pigging, expected to be completed by March 2, 2025, power supply would improve.
The Minister also disclosed that President John Dramani Mahama has dispatched him
to Nigeria to discuss with the Nigerian authorities ways to reach an agreement with a
Nigerian gas consortium to settle outstanding debts amounting to $75 million.
This move follows threats by N-Gas to shut down the gas pipeline that supplies fuel to
Ghana’s thermal plants due to the unpaid debt.
At the beginning of this month, the Ministry of Energy and WAPCo issued a statement
announcing the cleaning and inspection of a 56-kilometre onshore pipeline section
between Itoki and Badagry in Nigeria—an essential part of the West African Gas
Pipeline.
The maintenance exercise has disrupted gas flows from Nigeria as well as the reverse
flow of gas from Takoradi to thermal enclaves, affecting about 800 megawatts of
thermal capacity and significantly straining the national electricity supply.
Mr. Jinapor explained that as an interim measure, the government procured alternative
fuels (liquid oils) to power thermal plants while gas remains unavailable. However, he
admitted that the measure only allows for power generation to meet demand without a
reserve margin, putting immense pressure on the power supply system.
“It’s a very difficult task, but the indication I’m getting is that they are on schedule.
However, the next one week is very critical because it will determine the extent of the
success of the work they are pursuing. All things being equal, at the beginning of next
month, we should see the flow of gas, which means that power supply will be much,
much more enhanced,” he said.
He expressed appreciation to WAPCo officials for their cooperation, noting that the
company deferred the planned maintenance from January 20 to February following a
passionate appeal from the government to allow for emergency fuel procurement. He
pledged to strengthen the relationship with WAPCo to address future challenges.
N-Gas debt and Nigeria visit
The Minister also highlighted another challenge apart from the pigging exercise—the
threat by N-Gas to cut gas supply even after the maintenance due to an outstanding
liability of about $75 million.
To prevent further disruptions, Mr. Jinapor said the President has directed him to travel
to Nigeria to meet with his Nigerian counterparts to negotiate payment terms, including
making a partial payment to allow for continued supply.
“This clearly tells you that we inherited a very, very difficult situation, a very challenging
situation. Be that as it may, we have to find solutions to these challenges. And our main
efforts and concentration are on how we can find these solutions in the immediate
term, medium term, but more importantly, the long term,” he said.
He also apologized to Ghanaians for the inconvenience caused by the ongoing power
deficit.
The Managing Director of WAPCo, Michelle Burkett, General Manager of Operations and
Maintenance, Mr. Auwal Ibrahim, and General Manager of Corporate Affairs, Dr. Isaac
Adjei Doku, assured the Minister that maintenance works were progressing steadily and
expressed confidence that the March 2, 2025, deadline would be met.

Health 2 GO take off in Ghana

Ensign College which offers academic excellence in public health, on its beautiful eco-suitable learning Campus yesterday, Thursday, 14 July 2016 has started its Health 2 GO (H2GO) project in Kpong in the Lower Manya Krobo District, Eastern region.

The programme is based on the world health organisation’s strategy of integrated management of children’s illness (IMCI).  

This pilot programme in partnership with Rick Haskin’s organization; Cast a Pebble, along with University of Utah, Ensign College of Public Health and Ghana Health Service aims to minimize childhood morbidity and mortality in Ghana.

 It hopes to evolve into a nationwide programme building upon its sponsored relationship with Ghana Health services, as it overpasses the gap between the healthcare systems in the community.  

Speaking at the inauguration, the Municipal Director of Health Service, Lower Manya Krobo, in the Eastern Region, Ghana, Mrs. Irina Ofei asserted the community’s delight to be a fraction of the health seeking project.

“The Kpong Sub Municipal and Wawase CHPS zone are delighted to be a part of this (H2GO) project that seeks to improve the health outcomes in the project communities with emphasis on reducing childhood mortality and morbidity.”

Mrs. Irina Ofei said “I want to express our sincere gratitude, and we appreciate every effort, every cent spent on this project and I assure you that we will work very hard to ensure that Health 2 GO project will be fully operational and will achieve its targets and goal.”

H2GO differs from other programs in that it not only promotes education and awareness but also engages the community thus that they are self-sufficient over the long-run.

H2GO will equip community health volunteers with high-quality training, provide each of them with durable bicycles to aid in transportation on very rocky terrains, and a year’s worth of medical supplies so that they are able to reach, asses and treat communities as deemed appropriate.

“Public health is for everybody, public health is about everybody,” Prof. Steve Alder, board member of ENSIGN college notes. “Public health we are global; we think about the whole community. “

Diabetes on the rise in Dormaa Ahenkro – Nutritionists revealed Diabetes on the rise in Dormaa Ahenkro – Nutritionists revealed

Diabetes on the rise in Dormaa Ahenkro – Nutritionists revealed

The Nutrition Officer at Dormaa Ahenkro Presbyterian Hospital, Christian Abi, has revealed that the global incidence of diabetes is alarmingly high, affecting over 580 million individuals.

He emphasized that diabetes ranks among the top ten killer diseases worldwide, necessitating urgent attention.

Detailing the situation, he noted that, on average, 4 to 5 out of every 10 individuals in Ghana are diagnosed with diabetes. Focusing on the Bono Region, he highlighted that it is one of the areas in Ghana most susceptible to diabetes, with 6 to 7 out of every 10 individuals diagnosed with the condition.

In Dormaa Ahenkro and its neighboring communities, the figure rises to 8 to 9 out of every 10 individuals.

He underscored that diabetes lacks a definitive cure, but there are strategies to manage it, thereby extending the affected individual’s healthy state.

He noted that diabetic patients often experience fluctuating sugar levels, and thus, the optimal approach to managing diabetes is to exercise caution in their dietary choices to stabilize these levels.

He stressed that diet, alongside prescribed medications, serves only to regulate and manage the condition but cannot completely eradicate it.

Therefore, we must dismiss any assertions by herbalists and other conventional practitioners regarding their purported capability to cure diabetes.

The New Weight Loss Drugs and the Role of Dietitians in LMICs

Obesity is a growing concern worldwide, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Addressing this issue involves various strategies, including dietary and lifestyle changes, medical treatments, and professional support. Recently, some weight loss drugs have emerged as a potential tool in managing obesity.

This article offers basic explanation of how these drugs work, their potential in LMICs, associated risks, and how dietitians can ensure their safe and effective use.

How Do Weight Loss Drugs Work?

Many modern weight loss medications are GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as semaglutide (marketed as Ozempic and Wegovy) and tirzepatide (eg Mounjaro and Zepbound). These drugs mimic the action of the natural hormone GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1). This hormone plays a role in regulating appetite and blood sugar levels. In very simple terms, GLP-1 receptor agonists function in three main ways.

  1. Reduces appetite: It sends signals to the brain, making you feel full after eating smaller amounts.
  2. Slows down digestion: Food stays in the stomach longer, keeping you feeling satisfied for extended periods.
  3. Improves insulin function: It helps regulate blood sugar levels, which is particularly beneficial for people with type 2 diabetes.

Potential of the New Weight Loss Drugs in LMICs

These new weight loss drugs have shown promising results in reducing obesity and related complications like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. If made accessible and affordable, these medications could be a game-changer in LMICs, where obesity often coexists with undernutrition. Their use could reduce the healthcare burden associated with obesity-related diseases, ultimately benefiting communities and economies. However, the high cost of these drugs and limited healthcare infrastructure in LMICs present significant challenges. For example, semaglutide-based drugs can cost hundreds of dollars per month, putting them out of reach for most people in LMICs. Also, while GLP-1 receptor agonists can be effective, they are associated with potential side effects, primarily gastrointestinal issues such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation. These side effects are usually mild and tend to decrease over time. More serious adverse effects have been reported, though they are less common. Furthermore, the long-term effects of these medications on the body are not yet fully understood. Thus, it is crucial to use these medications under proper medical supervision.

How Can Dietitians Help?

There is limited research available on the use of the new weight loss drugs in LMICs. Dietitians in LMICs can however play a vital role in ensuring the safe use of the new weight loss drugs for patients who may be using them in the following ways;

  1. Assessing Suitability: Dietitians can help determine if weight loss medications are appropriate for an individual, considering factors like nutritional status and potential drug-nutrient interactions.
  2. Providing Nutrition Education: Dietitians can offer guidance on balanced diets and healthy eating habits, which are essential to complement the effects of weight loss drugs.
  3. Monitoring Side Effects: Dietitians can monitor patients for adverse reactions and work with healthcare teams to manage any issues that arise.
  4. Promoting Sustainable Lifestyle Changes: Dietitians can emphasize the importance of combining medication with dietary and lifestyle modifications, such as increased physical activity and behavioural changes, to achieve long-term weight management.

In summary

Weight loss drugs hold great potential for managing obesity in LMICs, but their success depends on more than just availability. Understanding how these medications work, addressing the risks, and ensuring their safe use are critical. Dietitians in LMICs are key players in this process, guiding individuals toward safe and effective weight management.

Birthright citizenship: Why the ‘right of soil’ is so big in the Americas

When US President Donald Trump signed a recent executive order that would deny citizenship to the children of undocumented immigrants living in the United States, he took aim at what he suggested was a peculiarly American principle: Birthright citizenship.

“It’s ridiculous. We are the only country in the world that does this with the birthright, as you know, and it’s just absolutely ridiculous,” said the 47th president of the United States as he questioned a principle that some of his opponents say lies at the very heart of what it means to be called an American. For more than 150 years, the 14th Amendment of the Constitution has granted automatic citizenship to any person born on US soil.

As the courts moved to temporarily block his order, various media outlets pointed out that the president’s remarks were not entirely accurate. According to the Law Library of Congress, more than 30 countries across the world recognize birthright citizenship on an unrestricted basis – in which children born on their soil automatically acquire the right regardless of their parents’ immigration status.

Strikingly, nearly all of those countries recognizing unrestricted birthright citizenship are in the Western Hemisphere, in North, South, and Central America.

The vast majority of countries in the rest of the world either do not recognize the jus soli (Latin for ‘right of soil’) principle on which unrestricted birthright citizenship is based or, if they do, do so only under certain circumstances – often involving the immigration status of the newborn child’s parents.

Brits to blame?

In North America, the ‘right of soil’ was introduced by the British via their colonies, according to “The Evolution of Citizenship” study by Graziella Bertocchi and Chiara Strozzi.

The principle had been established in English law in the early 17th century by a ruling that anyone born in a place subject to the king of England was a “natural-born subject of England.”

When the US declared independence, the idea endured and was used – ironically for the departing Brits – to keep out foreign influence, such as in the Constitution’s requirement that the president be a “natural-born citizen” of the US.

Still, it was not until the 1820s that a movement led by Black Americans – whose citizenship was not explicitly guaranteed at the time – forced the country to think seriously about the issue, according to Martha Jones, a professor of history at Johns Hopkins University.

“They land on birthright in part because the US Constitution of 1787 requires that the president of the United States be a natural-born citizen. So, they hypothesize that if there is such a thing as a natural-born citizen, they, just like the president, must be natural-born citizens of the United States.”

The principle would be debated for decades until it was finally made law in 1868 after the Civil War, which resulted in the freedom of enslaved Black Americans, and formalized by the 14th Amendment, which states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The economic incentive

But it wasn’t just the Brits in North America. Other European colonial powers introduced the idea in countries across Central and South America, too.

Driving the practice in many of these areas was an economic need. Populations in the Western Hemisphere were at the time much smaller than in other parts of the world that had been colonized and settlers often saw bestowing citizenship as a way to boost their labor forces.

“You had these Europeans coming and saying: ‘This land is now our land, and we want more Europeans to come here and we want them to be citizens of these new countries.’ So, it’s a mixture of colonial domination and then the idea of these settler states they want to populate,” said sociologist John Skrentny, a professor at the University of California, San Diego.

Later, just as the idea of ‘right of soil’ was turned against the Brits in North America, a similar reversal of fortunes took place in the European colonies to the south.

In Latin America, many newly formed countries that had gained independence in the 19th century saw ‘right of soil’ citizenship as a way to build national identity and thus further break from their former colonial rulers, according to the study by Bertocchi and Strozzi.

Without that principle, they reasoned, Spain could have claimed jurisdiction over people with Spanish ancestry who were born in former colonies like Argentina, said Bertocchi, a professor of economics at Universita’ di Modena e Reggio Emilia.

Right of soil to right of blood

So what about all those countries in other parts of the world that were also colonized by Europeans but today do not recognize the ‘right of soil’?

Many of them – particularly those in Asia and Africa – also turned to citizenship laws to send their former rulers a message.

However, in most cases these countries turned toward a different type of birthright citizenship that has its roots in European law: jus sanguinis (‘right of blood’), which is generally based on one’s ancestry, parentage, marriage or origins.

In some cases, this system was transplanted to Africa by European powers that practiced it, Strozzi and Bertocchi wrote in their study. But in other cases newly independent countries adopted it on their own accord to build their nations on an ethnic and cultural basis.

Doing so was a relatively easy change. As Skrentny points out, in many of these places the ‘right of soil’ had never become as ingrained as it had in the Americas, partly because their large native populations had meant the colonizers did not need to boost their workforces.

Jettisoning the ‘right of soil’ sent a message to the former colonists that “they didn’t want to hear any more of it,” said Bertocchi, while embracing the ‘right of blood’ ensured descendants of colonizers who remained in Africa would not be considered citizens.

“They all switched to jus sanguinis,” said Bertocchi. “It seems paradoxical, right? This time, to build a national identity, you needed to adopt this principle.”

More than 32,000 displaced as violence spirals in Colombian drug trafficking region

More than 32,000 people have fled to towns in northeast Colombia as they attempt to escape a sharp rise in fighting between militant factions, according to the country’s ombudsman.

Iris Marín said the violence escalated last week in the Catatumbo region, displacing tens of thousands of people. Hundreds more remain confined to their homes and are unable to evacuate due to the ferocity of the clashes, Marín warned Tuesday in a video statement.

Colombian authorities say 80 people have been killed in the fighting.

Almost half of those displaced have flocked to the city of Cúcuta near the Venezuelan border. Officials there have launched a major campaign to shelter the more than 15,000 people who have arrived in recent days.

In Cúcuta, the city’s football stadium has been turned into a large welcome center, with thousands of displaced victims lining up to receive food, water and clothing from locals.

Many are also sheltering in hotels and the homes of relatives, Cúcuta Mayor Jorge Acevedo said, pledging to support those in need.

“We are going to address the emergency that is occurring. Total solidarity, respect, affection and love for these human beings who are arriving in the city of Cúcuta,” Acevedo said.

Violence in strategic drug production territory

The humanitarian crisis is a direct result of increased clashes between the National Liberation Army – ELN – and spin-offgroups of thedisbanded Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC.

Both factions were founded around the 1960s and ‘70s as left-wing guerrilla groups, but are now mostly involved in drug trafficking and other criminal activities, according to Elizabeth Dickinson, Colombia senior analyst at the International Crisis Group.

The Catatumbo region in northeastern Colombia, where the crisis originated, is a strategic territory for both drug production and trafficking due to its proximity with Venezuela. The region has seen some of the highest levels of violence in modern Colombian history.

In response to the violence, Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro has suspended peace talks with the ELN, whose actions he described as criminal. On Monday, he said he would declare a state of internal unrest, but that decree has yet to be published or signed.

The Attorney General’s Office on Wednesday reactivated arrest warrants for 31 ELN members who were involved in peace negotiations. The judicial body said the move was due to “the evidence and the seriousness of the criminal acts” in the Catatumbo region.

The arrest warrants had been suspended since 2022, when Petro restarted the peace process with that armed group.

Some have criticized Petro’s “total peace” initiative which has attempted to reduce violence partly through negotiations.

“The crisis in Catatumbo should be a wake-up call for the Petro administration. Its ‘total peace’, coupled with the lack of effective security and justice policies, have allowed armed groups to expand their presence and brutal control over remote communities across Colombia,” said Juanita Goebertus, Americas director at Human Rights Watch.

CNN has reached out to the Colombian foreign ministry for comment.

Evacuation efforts

The Colombian cities of Ocaña and Tibú have also received 11,503 and 5,300 displaced people respectively, Colombia’s ombudsman Marín said Tuesday.

Other victims have fled to neighboring Venezuela, a country that in recent years has seen far more people leaving it’s borders than entering due to spiraling economic and political insecurity.

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil said the country has implemented a humanitarian operation to help Colombian families that have arrived in the municipality of Jesus Maria Semprún near the border in recent days.

Colombia’s defense ministry said more than 400 evacuations have been carried out in the Catatumbo region since the uptick in fighting last week, while more than 5,000 soldiers and special forces unit have been deployed to Cúcuta.

Trump’s desire for Greenland sets feelings on fire in the Arctic

Nuuk, GreenlandCNN — 

The comings and goings at Greenland’s new international airport in its capital Nuuk look a bit different of late, as journalists like me come here to see what all the fuss is about.

The fuss, of course, is the result of US Donald Trump’s interest in taking control of the massive island that is geographically part of North America but legally is part of the Kingdom of Denmark, a member of NATO, the European Union, and a US ally.

I wanted to drill down on what’s here, what makes it attractive and whether the local population is welcoming or hesitant about being in Trump’s sights.

“Greenland is the front door for North America,” said Tom Dans, leaning into the arguments of Greenland’s importance to US national security.

I’d wanted to speak to Dans, a private equity investor with prospective interests in the Arctic who campaigned for Trump, but I hadn’t expected to see him at the airport.

To be fair, Dans wasn’t hard to spot. He’s a tall Texan with one of those wide shiny smiles wealthy Americans tend to have. He was also wearing a baseball cap emblazoned with the American flag.

He didn’t have more time to chat then, so I stepped outside, into the 14 Fahrenheit (-10 Celsius) cold that was, I would learn, balmy compared to what was to come later in the week.

My CNN colleague Neil Bennett and I trudged through the snow to the back of a long line for taxis.

“You are here because Trump,” remarked a woman waiting in front of us. Not yet accustomed to the Nordic tone, I couldn’t quite tell if this was meant as a simple statement or an accusation. “We are,” I dutifully confirmed.

“They want more tourists to come here, they need to get more taxis,” she said. We needn’t worry too much though, she explained, we wouldn’t be waiting in the cold for too long. Despite the apparent shortage of taxis, they can’t go very far and return quickly. The trip to the center of Nuuk from the airport is about 4 miles — and then the roads just stop. There is nowhere else to go, at least by car. Greenland — three times the size of Texas — has only about 56 miles of paved roads.

She introduced herself as Lisbeth Højdal, a consultant from Denmark who was here to run a course training career counselors.

The Danish government provides Greenland a grant of about $500 million every year to support health, education and other services here. Højdal’s course was part of that package of support.

So, before I’d even had a chance to look around, I’d heard the views of outsiders — one American, one Dane.

But Greenlanders have many different views.

“We have always been told that Denmark is the big savior of Greenland,” Qupanuk Olsen recalls. The Danes, she says, look down on her and fellow native Greenlandic people who are Inuit: “You guys cannot stand on your own feet; you guys don’t have anything without us. You can’t study, you don’t have health care, you have nothing without us.”

Olsen is known as “Greenland’s biggest influencer” with more than a million subscribers combined across Youtube, TikTok and Instagram where she shows the world the best of Greenlandic, and specifically Inuit, culture.

For an introduction to that culture, she brings me to see the “Mother of the Sea” — a striking stone sculpture on Nuuk’s rocky coast, depicting Sedna, the goddess of the sea in the Inuit religion. At high tide the statue is partially submerged.

Inuits (sometimes incorrectly referred to as “Eskimos”) make up almost 90% of Greenland’s population of 57,000.

We walk a few steps away from the shoreline and the “Mother of the Sea,” and Olsen points to the top of a hill and another figure, “I really want this statue gone.”
The statue, which looks over all of Nuuk, is of Hans Egede, an 18th-century Dano-Norwegian missionary who brought Christianity to the island.

“Why should he be up there? Why isn’t it a Greenlander up there?” Olsen asks. “We Greenlanders should be more proud of who we are … not celebrate some foreigner who came here and changed our culture and colonized us.”

Danish control of Greenland dates to the time of Egede. Greenland was granted home-rule in 1979 and, after a referendum in 2008, the island was allowed more self-governing powers including the ability to hold a referendum on independence (though independence would also require approval from the Danish parliament.)

But despite the increased autonomy, for Olsen the statue of Egede is a daily reminder of Danish colonization — something she purposefully talks about in the present tense.

“I used to be a royalist. I used to look up to the Danish people and thought they were better than me. Now, I’ve really realized that’s not the case,” she says.

In the 1960s and 70s, doctors placed IUD contraceptives in young Inuit girls without their or their parents’ consent as a means of population control. An investigation by Danish and Greenlandic officials into what has become known as “the spiral case” is expected to finish this year.

“I should have a lot more cousins,” Olsen says.

Another practice known as “legally fatherless” allowed Danish men who impregnated unmarried women in Greenland to skirt any responsibilities for their child. Olsen says her mother was one of the “legally fatherless” children born here.

In recent weeks, Denmark has announced a boost in Arctic defense spending and the Danish king revealed a new design for the royal coast of arms, making far more prominent the symbols for Greenland and the Faroe Islands (also part of the Kingdom of Denmark.)

But it’s too little, too late, says Olsen, who supports independence for Greenland and is standing in upcoming elections.

She acknowledges an independent Greenland would need to sign new agreements with other countries for defense of its 27,000 miles of coastline, and other arrangements when it comes to trade and financial support, but for her that’s no reason to jump from Danish control to American.

“Why should I? I’m so proud of who we are as Inuit,” she says. “Why should we just be taken by another colonizer?”

The US already has strong connections with and interest in Greenland.

But even Boassen does not want Greenland to be taken over by the US.

He doesn’t want to be subsumed as the 51st state, he says, but wants the US to be Greenland’s “best and closest ally with everything — with defense, mining, oil exploration, trade, everything.”

Not all Greenlanders want to break free from Denmark.

“We might be ready someday, but not today, not tomorrow,” says Aqqalu C. Jerimiassen, the leader of Atassut, a party in favor of staying within the Danish kingdom.

He acknowledged the wrongs committed against native Greenlanders and said the Danes must accept responsibility.

“Every colonizer has made mistakes,” he said. “But we cannot live in the past.”

Atassut, which describes itself as a “moderate conservative” party, supports universal health care, free education, and other forms of welfare that are basic concepts across much of Europe, and which Denmark provides for Greenland.

He says while some here “very much would like to be US citizens and would like to follow the American dream,” most would not be in favor of joining the United States and losing universal access to these services.

Greenland is holding elections next month that may reveal more about its population’s views about future relationships with the world. And the parliament just fast-tracked a law banning foreign political funding.

That’s fine by Højdal — the Danish guidance counselor I met at the airport — who said Greenland’s future is for Greenland, not anyone else, to decide.

As she watches the news coming from the United States of the hectic first weeks of the second Trump administration, she says a Turkish proverb comes to mind.

“When a clown enters a castle, he doesn’t become a king. The castle becomes a circus.”

Greenland, she hopes, doesn’t become a circus.

This firm employs thousands in Canada, the US and Mexico. Here’s what its workers think of Trump’s tariffs

“With respect to the so-called trade deficit,” Wildeboer said, “If you take out cheap oil, which US refineries refine and make a ton of money, the US actually has a trade surplus.”

Moreover, the exchange in auto parts between the two countries, Wildeboer explained, is pretty much even, give or take a few million dollars.

“Canada is the largest purchaser of US goods,” Wildeboer continued. “We’re a big customer. At the end of the day, I think you’d want to keep a customer.”

‘It’s gonna hurt anyhow’

Sultan Egebesci, originally from Turkey, has lived in Canada for four years and has worked at Martinrea for three. She considers the company her “second family.”

“Of course, I’m worried,” Egebesci told CNN when asked about the looming possibility of a trade war with the United States. But she said was trying not to stress out too much.

“I know when we do everything together, everything gonna be fixed,” Egebesci said of Canadians. “Everything can be fixed.”

Egebesci is encouraged by the movement to “Buy Canadian,” and told CNN that when she shops, she first looks for a “Made in Canada” label before making a purchase.

“I feel confident,” said Pisey Lim, another Martinrea employee. “I really trust the company.” Her friends at other companies nearby, however, “feel a little bit nervous.”

“They’re scared they might lose their job,” Lim said. “They see in their work, it’s quite less work. Some people stay home.”

Naitik Jariwalla, who’s worked at Martinrea for three years, said he was worried about the possibility of losing his job, but thought Canada was “taking the right steps.”

“The government has been prepared for almost a month now,” Jariwalla said. “I have hope for Martinrea.”

However, Jariwalla predicted that the issue wouldn’t go away anytime soon. It’s time, he said, to dig in. Canada should stand up to the United States “even if it hurts a bit.”

“It may take one or two years to settle down,” Jariwalla told CNN. “But this is a good time for Canada to support their legs and stop relying on another country. I think it’s going to be good for Canada. I think Canada can grow.”

“It’s gonna hurt anyhow,” Jariwalla continued. “Either you deal with it right now, or in the future.”

A ‘big deal’ in the States

Despite the Canadian flags hanging on the factory walls, Martinrea is in some ways an American company, too. Wildeboer points out that the company employs twice as many people in the US as in Canada, particularly in Michigan, where Trump won a slim majority in 2024.

“We’re a big deal locally,” Wildeboer said. “We take care of a lot of people. I would say that a lot of those people like President Trump and they like his message: lower inflation, more jobs, strong economy. But with the tariffs and so forth, you’re getting higher inflation, less jobs, weaker economy.”

The executive guessed that those employees might change their mind on the president’s agenda come midterm elections in two years. That said, apart from his position on tariffs, Wildeboer admitted he understands much of Trump’s message about Canada.

“A lot of what President Trump or the Americans have said to Canadians has a lot of merit,” Wildeboer said.

In response, Trudeau has agreed to appoint a “Fentanyl Czar” to deal with the issue. The prime minister even said that Canada would follow the US in declaring cartels as terrorist organizations, though Mexico’s president said she considers the US designation unhelpful.

“In the context of fixing our border, dealing with fentanyl or immigration, I think that the vast majority of Canadians agree,” Wildeboer said. “I think most Canadians would agree that we should spend more on our military. We should defend our Arctic. We have Chinese planes and Russian planes flying over our land. At the end of the day, that’s our land. We should protect it. We should protect it with the United States.”

Israel troops withdraw from corridor that split Gaza in two

Israeli troops have withdrawn from the Netzarim Corridor – a military zone cutting off the north of the Gaza Strip from the south.

Hundreds of Palestinians in cars and on carts laden with mattresses and other goods began returning to northern Gaza following the pull-out – often to scenes of utter destruction.

The Israeli withdrawal is in line with the Israel-Hamas ceasefire agreement of 19 January under which 16 Israeli hostages and 566 Palestinian prisoners have so far been freed.

By the end of the first stage of the ceasefire in three weeks’ time, 33 hostages and 1,900 prisoners are expected to have been freed. Israel says eight of the 33 are dead.

Hamas seized 251 hostages and killed about 1,200 people when it attacked Israel on 7 October 2023, triggering the Gaza war.

At least 48,189 Palestinians have been killed in Israel’s offensive, according to Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry. About two-thirds of Gaza’s buildings have been damaged or destroyed by Israel’s attacks, the UN says.

On Sunday, crowds of Palestinians were seen traversing the Netzarim Corridor – mostly moving north to see what had happened to their abandoned homes.

“What we saw was a catastrophe, horrific destruction. The [Israeli] occupation destroyed all the homes, shops, farms, mosques, universities and the courthouse,” Osama Abu Kamil, a resident of al-Maghraqa just north of Netzarim, told the AFP news agency.

The 57-year-old, who had been forced to live for more than a year in the southern Gazan city of Khan Yunis, said he now planned to “set up a tent for me and my family next to the rubble of our house”.

“We have no choice,” he added.

Mahmoud al-Sarhi, another displayed Palestinian, told AFP that for him “arriving at the Netzarim Corridor meant death until this morning”.

He said this was “the first time I saw our destroyed house”, referring to his home in the nearby Zeitun area.

“The entire area is in ruins. I cannot live here,” he added.

About 700,000 residents of northern Gaza fled to southern areas at the start of the war, when the Israeli military issued mass evacuation orders before launching a ground invasion of the Palestinian territory.

Many of those displaced were subsequently forced to move multiple times after Israeli forces pushed into southern Gaza, too.

They were also prevented from returning to their homes through the Netzarim Corridor, stretching from the Gaza-Israel border to the Mediterranean Sea.

Israeli forces partially withdrew from the west of the corridor last month and the first Palestinians – pedestrians – were allowed to walk along the coastal Rashid Street as they crossed into northern Gaza.

Those on vehicles have to use Salah al-Din Street and undergo screening for weapons by US and Egyptian security contractors.

The Israel Defense Forces have not officially commented on Sunday’s withdrawal from the eastern part of the corridor, which will leave it in control of Gaza’s borders, but not the road that had cut it in half.

The Haaretz newspaper says the Hamas-run Gaza interior ministry has been urging people to “exercise caution and adhere to the existing movement guidelines for their safety”.

The troop withdrawal comes as an Israeli delegation is expected to fly to Qatar which has been moderating talks between the two sides in the Gaza war.

The Israeli government has previously said the delegation will initially discuss “technical matters” regarding the first phase of the ceasefire deal, rather than the more challenging second phase which is meant to lead to a permanent ceasefire, the exchange of all remaining living hostages in Gaza for more Palestinian prisoners and a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.

That will require further direction from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who recently became the first foreign leader to meet US President Donald Trump since his return to the White House.

During the trip, in the most dramatic shift in US policy regarding Gaza in decades, Trump called for the removal of the territory’s entire civilian population and the development of what he called “The Riviera of the Middle East”.

Convening his first cabinet meeting since returning to Israel over the weekend, Netanyahu said Trump had come up with a “completely different vision, much better for the State of Israel”.

“A revolutionary, creative vision – and we are discussing it,” he was quoted as saying in an official readout of the meeting. “He [Trump] is very determined to carry it out. It also opens up many possibilities for us.”

Trump’s proposal, which would be a crime under international law, has been almost universally rejected, including by Arab states.

The Saudi foreign ministry said on Saturday that it would not accept “any infringement on the Palestinians’ unalienable rights, and any attempts at displacement,” accusing Israel of “ethnic cleansing”.

Egypt has also rejected any idea of the removal of the Palestinian population and has said it is calling an emergency summit of the Arab League on 27 February to discuss what it called “serious” Palestinian developments.

Product has been added to your cart